| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
112
   |
Posted - 2014.08.03 16:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is a bad, bad idea. It's going to lead to people just sitting and orbiting their towers instead of taking the risk to roll a hole and go do something, be that trying to find a fight or doing some PvE. People are going to extract from fights instead of committing caps to try and win them. It's punishing smaller groups who need the advantage of caps, and it's going to lead to less people doing things in wormholes in general, which is the exact opposite of what you should be trying to do.
Don't make the things people are already doing more tedious, add in new things for them to do that are riskier. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
112
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 16:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sniper fleets work for defense, extremely well... So well that they usually just make the attackers go "screw this" and jump back, because they know they can't counter a bunch of ishtars at 80KM. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
112
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 16:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'll hold further judgement until I see the actual plans, and the full list of other proposed changes. I hope we'll be listened to at that point if we disagree with some or all of them. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
112
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 16:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
People roll with a gang larger than that, except they're in the correct ships for the fight they're looking for instead of all being in rolling battleships. Having to wait for half your fleet to go back to their poses and change ships is going to lead to losing fights. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
112
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 16:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Not everyone has alts or is happy to multibox. Saying "Just give CCP more money because they broke the game" isn't a helpful perspective.
HerrBert wrote:
Meanwhile on reddit?
What are you thinking with this change? 38 Points (74 % liked this)
Guys you are sending mixed signals
I don't really understand what you're trying to say here... |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
114
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 17:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
don't even joke about removing poses, they'll probably do it. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
114
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 17:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:Moo Moocow wrote:I like the idea of CCP getting around to looking at Wormholes, Its been far too long.
IMO you should be enhancing gameplay (or even income in lower class wh's if you have to.)
hopefully they get around to removing capital escalations
Sure. and make cynos work in wormholes. and make it so you can have titans there. And add gates and stations!
|
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
114
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 17:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
Brutus Crendraven wrote:
PVP (method of destroying isk to generate a level of income for CCP)
I feel the need to point out that PvP doesn't destroy isk, it destroys materials. The isk is in the hands of whoever sold the PvPers those ships.
If anything, isk is created through the insurance system. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
114
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 18:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
The isk is not removed from the economy. It's removed from the wallet of the player who lost the ship, should they choose to replace it. There IS a difference. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
114
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 18:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bronya Boga wrote:
I would ask that you reconsider this feature and throw it away and maybe work on Black holes or something.
Good idea |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
115
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 18:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
If it's worth saying, say it on your main. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
116
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 18:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
And every large entity WANTS the smaller groups to be committing and using caps. More fights are good. Caps dead on either side means more fun. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
117
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 18:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
We already have the same few people with alts doing the boosting/scanning/massing when we rageroll, because other people would have to swap out of a combat ship. This is just going to burn out the people who can multibox even faster. |
Erasmus Phoenix
Balls to the Walls
No Response
120
|
Posted - 2014.08.03 19:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Polarization doesn't happen with gates, and aggression timers don't affect wormholes. Apples and oranges. |
| |
|